The Last Samurai (2003)

| Action,Adventure,Drama,War
USA / English
"In the face of an enemy, in the Heart of One Man, Lies the Soul of a Warrior. " An American military advisor embraces the Samurai culture he was hired to destroy after he is captured in battle.
|
Pretty damn good.
In the hands of a great filmmaker, "The Last Samurai" could have been a
great
film. As it is, it's a good film -- at times even a very good film --
and
that's
certainly no small achievement.
Director Ed Zwick, of course, is no David Lean -- though "Glory" and
"Courage
Under Fire" are excellent films ("Legends of the Fall" is decent, while I
consider
"Leaving Normal" one of the most mundane films ever made). Here Zwick
has
attempted a traditional epic, and as with "Courage Under Fire", depicts
the
horrors of war through a story of personal redemption. Into this basic
story he
also injects themes of honor, pride, cultural clashes and technological
change
versus ancient tradition.
Unfortunately, though, no matter how lofty the ambitions, the bottom line
here is
that in order to transcend the fairly standard
hero-goes-on-a-journey-and-
undergoes-change plot that we've all seen many times before, something
pretty
new and special has to be added. It's a little late to rehash the old
"Searchers"/
"Emerald Forest"/"Dances With Wolves" tale of the white man being
captured
by
enemies and siding with his captors -- unless it's aimed primarily at
people
who
have never seen "The Searchers" or "The Emerald Forest" (Arthur Penn
realized
this thirty years ago, and made the hero and the journey of "Little Big
Man"
primarily comedic -- one of the main reasons the film works as well as it
does).
But in the post-Altman/Ashby/Penn era -- where nearly all films --
especially
action/adventure films -- have returned to the grandiose seriousness of
their
1950s counterparts (with little or none of the wit and satire that crept
through in
the 60s and 70s), it is therefore pretty much expected that we will get
the
typical
grandiose, serious, high-gloss and overlong treatment all the way
through,
with
very little humor. And that's too bad. Because a lighter touch could
have
gone a
long way towards getting the audience more involved, and making Cruise's
character more likable (indeed, the few humorous lines and scenes he has
are
among the film's most memorable moments; they humanize his character and
endear us to him).
And this is one reason "The Last Samurai," despite a bunch of probable
Oscars,
is going to miss its target of becoming a beloved classic, an
action/adventure
epic for the ages. Just as Sam Mendes did with "Road to Perdition,"
Zwick
has
tried a little too hard to impress. By pouring on the big, movie-type
moments, he
merely reminds us that he's emulating the greatness of classic directors,
without
ever equaling them. Zwick -- as I'm sure he will readily admit -- is
merely
a
student of great filmmakers such as Lean or Kurosawa; he will likely
never
be
one himself. The sensibility just isn't there, the life experience is
missing.
Cruise, similarly -- despite his talent -- will never be any kind of
substitute for a
Flynn or a Gable or a Bogart; Cruise is, after all, the kid from "Risky
Business"
who danced around in his underwear. The grinning jock with the big nose
from
"Top Gun." The goofball pool hustler from "The Color of Money." The
difference
between someone like Cruise (or De Niro, or any of today's top stars) and
a
complex personality such as Stewart or Fonda or Bogart or Gable is simply
immeasurable. The heart and soul of those great actors is somehow
missing
from most of today's performers. So by making a film like "The Last
Samurai" in
an old-fashioned, traditional way, it constantly invites comparison -- to
great
stars, to great directors, to the great age of studio filmmaking which,
like
the
Samurai, is now gone -- never to return.
The sad fact is that the great movie-makers are dying off, leaving us
with
imitators, not originators. In the last ten years we've lost Fellini,
Kurosawa,
Kubrick, Wilder, Frankenheimer, Fuller. In the last six months alone we
lost
John Schlesinger and Elia Kazan. Is anyone really expecting to see some
sort
of masterpiece by a T.V. producer/director named Ed Zwick?!
Still, "The Last Samurai" manages to succeed in a number of ways --
mainly
in
presenting nineteenth-century Japan in a remarkably realistic way, and in
its
brutal battle scenes, shot in gory "Braveheart"-style by the great
cinematographer John Toll. It is in these terrifying, agonizing moments
of
sword-versus-rifle battle that Zwick comes closest to emulating his
obvious
hero,
Akira Kurosawa, and manages to comment on the tragedy and insanity of
war.
Flashbacks are used unnecessarily to try to enforce Cruise's sense of
guilt
in
participating in the the slaughter of the Indians (so we will understand
his
desire
to defend another endangered species, the Samurai). As the apparent
title
character, Ken Watanabe pretty much steals the show as Katsumodo, the
sage
warrior leader whom Cruise befriends. A Japanese actress known only as
Koyuki plays the heartbreakingly beautiful wife of a Samurai Cruise
kills,
who
Cruise grows close to. But perhaps most amazing of the Japanese cast is
the
small boy who plays one of her sons. Unexpectedly expressive, emotional,
and
charming, he's the type of face you would expect to see in a film by the
great
Kurosawa. Or Lean. Or Ford.
All technical aspects, from production and costume design to visual
effects,
are
excellent. Hans Zimmer's score, incorporating traditional wood flutes
and
thunderous drums, is at times touching and evocative, at times bombastic
and
unnecessarily loud. All in all, "The Last Samurai" is an impressive
production.
And even if it misses being the cinematic classic it strives towards,
all
involved
can be proud of their accomplishment.
And whatever its faults, it's almost a miracle when a Hollywood studio
today
turns out something even a fraction this good.
PersonalSeen it: | Nej |
Nr of disks/tapes: | 1 |
Storage device: | DVD |
 |
Loan